Skip to content
Desk and Daylight

Editorial policy

The rules we hold ourselves to. Written down so you can hold us to them too.

Who writes here

Stephen V. writes Desk & Daylight. He is a home-office enthusiast, genuinely interested in the category — not an ergonomist, physiotherapist, occupational-health professional, engineer or clinician, and this site will never suggest otherwise. There is no editorial team and no expert panel. See about.

The site is owned and operated by Type 5 Marketing LLC, which we disclose because you should know who is behind a page trying to sell you a chair.

No paid placements. Ever.

No brand pays to appear on this site.No sponsored rankings, no paid inclusion, no “partner picks”, no advertorial. No brand has been given a preview of a page, a right of reply before publication, or a veto after it.

We earn affiliate commission when you buy through our links, which is disclosed on the disclosure page, in the footer of every page, and next to the first buy button of every page that has one. Commission rate is not an input to ranking. It is true on day one and it is cheap to keep true.

What we will not publish

  • A hands-on claim on a page that was researched, not handled. A testing or hands-on claim may appear only on a hands-on review backed by our own photographs. On every other page it is forbidden — not in the past tense, not implied, not in a meta description.
  • A credential we do not hold.No CPT, CSCS, MD, DPT, OT, “certified ergonomist”, “medically reviewed by”, or “our expert panel”.
  • A fabricated review, testimonial, rating or reviewer. This site is new and has no customers. It therefore has no testimonials section — a clean page beats an invented one.
  • A number we cannot source. Unverified specs render as a dash.
  • A price, rating or review count written by hand. Those come from the live API or they do not appear.
  • A medical claim. See below.
  • An invented award or tenure. The brand is new. It has won nothing.

The claim ceiling: mechanisms, never outcomes

This is the line we will not cross, and it is worth being precise about.

We describe geometry and mechanism: a lumbar rest adjusts through a published range; a seat at your popliteal height lets your feet rest flat; a light bar lowers the contrast between a screen and the wall behind it. Those are physical facts about objects.

We do notclaim that any of it prevents, treats, cures or relieves anything. A chair does not fix your back. A standing desk is not a health intervention we are qualified to prescribe. When we cite research, we report what it actually measured — sitting time, self-reported discomfort, task performance — and not the health outcome the category likes to imply.

Where the evidence is weak, we say so, even when it undercuts the product we are linking to. Our standing desk page reports Cochrane’s finding that the health benefits are “unproven” and that standing “hardly increases energy expenditure”, on a page with a buy button on it. That is the policy working.

If you are in pain, see a clinician. Not a website with an Amazon link.

Sourcing

Every number has a source or it does not ship. In order of preference: the manufacturer’s own spec sheet, manual or warranty document; published standards; government and peer-reviewed guidance; Amazon’s API for price and images; and aggregated owner reviews for the subjective half — always labeled as owners’ reports, never as our finding.

Never a source:our memory, another affiliate site’s numbers, a manufacturer’s marketing adjective, a retailer’s listing copy, or a language model’s recollection of a spec.

That last one about retailer copy is not theoretical. On this site you will find a cable clip whose Amazon listing claims it fits cables roughly twice the diameter the manufacturer states, and a chair that listings widely describe as 300 lb which its maker rates at 275. When a retailer and a manufacturer disagree about the manufacturer’s own product, the manufacturer wins.

Sources are linked and dated with the day we read them, at the foot of every page. Full method on the methodology page.

Updates and dates

Every page carries a “last reviewed”date. That is the date a human actually re-checked the page — not the date the site was rebuilt. An automated date bump with no review behind it is a lie, and a cheap one to get caught at, so we do not do it.

Our cadence:

  • Prices— refreshed automatically. Anything older than 48 hours disappears rather than going stale.
  • Roundups and Spec Lines— quarterly, and whenever a product is discontinued, a spec sheet is revised, or a better option appears.
  • Setup guides— annually, or when a standard is revised.
  • Methodology— on any change to how we rank.
  • Disclosure— on any change to how we earn.

Corrections

We will get things wrong. Manufacturers revise spec sheets, we misread a table, a model is superseded quietly.

When that happens: tell us, and we will fix it and log the correction visibly on the pagerather than editing it silently. Something like — “Corrected 2026-08-02: seat height is 16–20″, not 16–21″. Thanks to the reader who flagged it.”

A correction you can see is worth more than a page that has never admitted one. Report anything at our contact page or info@deskanddaylight.com.

Hands-on reviews, and samples

Some products we review hands-on. Those pages are labeled as hands-on reviews, they carry our own photographs, and they describe one unit used by one person over a period the page states. Everything else on this site is researched from published specifications and labeled that way. The rule, in one line: a testing or hands-on claim may appear only on a hands-on review backed by our own photographs, and a spec-researched page never implies testing.

Brands sometimes send us a product and do not ask for it back. That is allowed, on these terms and no others:

  • The sample is disclosed at the top of the page, above the first thing you could click, naming the brand and what they sent.
  • No preview and no approval. The brand does not read the review before publication, gets no right of reply before it, and has no veto after it. Nothing is removed because a brand asked.
  • Our own photographs. Not the brand’s press images, not a catalog render.
  • We say what came from the brand and what didn’t. The rest of the room is usually ours, and the page distinguishes the two rather than letting a supplied setup read as a personal one.
  • No payment, and no conditions. We do not take money for a review, and we do not accept a sample on any condition attached to what the review says. If a brand asks for one, the answer is no and the request goes in the piece.

A sample buys a review. It does not buy a verdict, a ranking, or a sentence.

Last reviewed: 17 July 2026.